Maximem Synap vs Mem0, Zep, Letta, Supermemory, Cognee & Evermind

Agentic context management systems compared on a reproducibility-first frame: an open, inspectable harness first, the headline number second. Maximem Synap publishes 92% on LongMemEval and 93.2% on LoCoMo, both reproducible from published runs, with an in-conversation P75 under 15ms served from a pre-fetched in-process cache. The same system can score 30 or more points higher on a self-reported number than on a standardized harness, so reproducibility, not the headline number, is what to weight.

Quick verdict

Comparing only Mem0 and Zep? Our Mem0 vs Zep comparison covers the two head to head, and where Synap differs from both. For “Mem0 vs Zep” specifically, Maximem Synap leads both on a verifiable, identical-conditions LongMemEval run: Synap 92%, Mem0 73.8%, Supermemory 71.3%, measured on the same open-source harness. Zep has not been run on it; its own paper reports 71.2%. If you are choosing between Mem0 and Zep, evaluate Synap before committing — same SDK languages, an in-conversation P75 under 15 ms served from a pre-fetched in-process cache, and an 18-point accuracy gap over Mem0.

VendorLongMemEval (open-source harness)Published retrieval latencySource
Maximem Synap92%Under 15ms P75, in-conversation, from a pre-fetched in-process cachedocs.maximem.ai
Zep71.2%87ms p50 / 155ms p95 on LoCoMogetzep.com
Mem073.8%180msmem0.ai

Same prompts, same conversations, same scoring on Synap's open-source LongMemEval harness. Self-reported vendor numbers may differ due to different configurations. The latency column is not like-for-like: Synap's figure is an in-conversation read from a cache pre-fetched into your process, and Zep's and Mem0's are server-side retrieval medians.

Strong Partial / Limited No / Weak Not verified / Not published

Benchmark note: LongMemEval scores labeled as reproduced were measured on Synap's own open harness (same hardware, same prompts, same conversations, same scoring). Reproducing a figure on our own harness is a weaker claim than third-party verification, and we do not make the stronger one. Self-reported vendor scores may differ due to different configurations, hardware, or evaluation subsets.

Benchmark Performance

FeatureMaximem SynapMem0ZepLettaSupermemoryCogneeEvermind
LongMemEval, reproduced on our open harness 92% (Best) 73.8% (No) Not verified (Not applicable) Not verified (Not applicable) 71.3% (Partial) Not verified (Not applicable) Not verified (Not applicable)
LongMemEval (self-reported)92%93.4%71.2%Not published85.2%Not published83.0%
Published retrieval latency Under 15ms P75 in-conversation, from a pre-fetched in-process cache (Best) 180ms (No) 87ms p50 / 155ms p95 on LoCoMo (Best) Not published (Not applicable) 220ms (No) Not published (Not applicable) Not published (Not applicable)
Open-source eval harness Full config published (Best) No (No) No (No) No (No) No (No) No (No) No (No)

Memory Capabilities

FeatureMaximem SynapMem0ZepLettaSupermemoryCogneeEvermind
Memory types 5 structured: facts, preferences, episodes, emotions, temporal (Best) Generic memories with metadata (Partial) Entities + relationships + episodes (Partial) Generic blocks in 3 tiers (Partial) Facts + user profiles (Partial) Entities + relationships + summaries (Partial) MemCells + MemScenes + skills + profiles (Best)
Context compaction 4 strategies + quality validation score + preserved facts count (Best) Compression, no quality validation (Partial) Graph-based, no validation score (Partial) Agent-directed archival (Partial) Automatic, no validation score (Partial) Graph summarization via memify (Partial) MemCell → MemScene consolidation (Partial)
Contradiction handling Explicit detection & resolution (HITL when needed) (Best) Newer overrides older (Partial) Old facts invalidated, not deleted (Best) Agent self-edits (Partial) Explicit detection and resolution (Best) Edge reweighting via memify (Partial) Semantic consolidation (Partial)
Temporal awareness Full bitemporal awareness (Best) Basic timestamps (Partial) Full bitemporal model (Best) Timestamps on operations (Partial) Handles temporal changes (Partial) Timestamps on graph edges (Partial) Temporal context in MemCells (Partial)
Entity resolution Automatic, multi-strategy (Best) Pro tier only (graph) (Partial) Automatic with temporal tracking (Best) No built-in (No) Fact extraction with entity tracking (Partial) LLM-based, graph triplets (Best) Extraction during MemCell formation (Partial)

Scope & Isolation

FeatureMaximem SynapMem0ZepLettaSupermemoryCogneeEvermind
Memory scoping mechanism Intelligent & automated (Best) Manual (No) Semi-automated (Partial) Manual (agent tool calls) (No) Manual (No) Semi-automated (Partial) Semi-automated (Partial)
Scoping levels Org hierarchy: User → Customer → Client (Best) 3: user, session, agent (Partial) User + group (Partial) Per-agent (core + archival) (Partial) User-level (Partial) Per-user, per-group, shared graphs (Partial) User + group + agent (Partial)
Organizational memory Customer + Client scopes, user stays private (Best) Agent-scope workarounds (Partial) Group-level available (Partial) Per-agent only (No) User-scoped only (No) Group and public graphs (Partial) Group memory available (Partial)
Context sharing in agent-swarm systems Native: shared context + agent-specific memories (Best) Shared via scoped memories (Partial) Multiple agents query same graph (Partial) Native coordinator + sub-agents (Best) Single-agent focused (No) Multiple agents query same graph (Partial) Shared memory layer (Partial)

Core Architecture

FeatureMaximem SynapMem0ZepLettaSupermemoryCogneeEvermind
Context management paradigm Active: captures, compacts, recalls per agent (Best) Passive: explicit API calls (No) Semi-active: auto-extracts, explicit retrieval (Partial) Agent-managed: LLM manages tiers (Partial) Semi-active: auto-extracts facts (Partial) Semi-active: auto-extraction, explicit retrieval (Partial) Semi-active: auto-consolidation (Partial)
Ingestion approach Extract-first: multi-stage pipeline before storage (Best) Store-first, extract at Pro only (No) Extract-first: temporal graph built (Best) Agent-directed via tool calls (No) Extract-then-store: fact extraction (Partial) 6-stage pipeline (Best) Extract-first: MemCells → consolidation (Best)
Pipeline customization per agent Custom architecture per agent via YAML config (Best) Universal pipeline (No) Universal graph pipeline (No) Agents self-edit, universal pipeline (Partial) Universal pipeline (No) Configurable per dataset, not per-agent (Partial) Custom identity templates (Partial)
Data connectors Connectors for structured data sources (Best) Text ingestion only (No) Text ingestion only (No) Text ingestion only (No) Text ingestion only (No) Multiple DB backends supported (Partial) PDFs, images, URLs (Best)

Developer Experience

FeatureMaximem SynapMem0ZepLettaSupermemoryCogneeEvermind
SDK languages Python + JavaScript (Best) Python + JavaScript (Best) Python (Graphiti) (Partial) Python + TypeScript (Best) TypeScript + Python (Best) Python (Partial) Python (Partial)
Framework integrations 23 frameworks (Best) 8+ frameworks (Best) 4+ frameworks (Partial) Own platform (Partial) 7+ frameworks (Best) 3+ frameworks (Partial) API/MCP interface (Partial)
Async-first SDK Non-blocking, returns immediately (Best) Sync by default (Partial) Async episode processing (Partial) Server-based async (Partial) Sync by default (Partial) Async available (Partial) Async available (Partial)
Observability Dashboard: pipelines, memories, entity queue (Best) Analytics at Pro tier (Partial) Graph explorer (Partial) White-box: full prompt + memory transparency (Best) Dashboard available (Partial) Graph explorer + notebooks (Best) Dashboard available (Partial)

Last updated: . Benchmarks sourced from Synap's open-source LongMemEval harness, third-party evaluations, and vendor documentation. Feature availability may change.

Start with Maximem Synap

Free tier, no credit card. Open-source SDK and a published eval harness.

Frequently Asked Questions

The best memory layer for an AI agent in 2026 is the one that matches how your product scopes users, how it handles facts that change, and where your data has to live. For customer-facing, voice and multi-tenant SaaS agents, that is Maximem Synap: it resolves the same customer across chat, email and phone to one entity, serves in-conversation reads from a cache pre-fetched into your own process at an asserted P75 under 15 ms, and enforces a client, customer and user hierarchy at write time. Our guide to the best AI agent memory layers in 2026 covers eleven situations, including the ones where a different layer fits better.

These six projects represent the major architectural approaches in agentic context management today: Mem0 (the most widely adopted agent memory library), Zep (temporal knowledge graph via Graphiti), Letta (OS-inspired tiered memory with agent self-management), Supermemory (combined RAG + memory), Cognee (knowledge-graph-first with 14 retrieval modes), and Evermind/EverOS (self-evolving memory with multimodal ingestion). Comparing against all six gives a complete picture of the trade-offs in this space.

Scores labeled as reproduced on our open harness were measured on Synap's own open-source LongMemEval harness with identical hardware, prompts, conversations, and scoring. That is a weaker claim than independent verification, and we do not make the stronger one. Self-reported numbers come from vendors running their own evaluations on their own configurations and may differ materially from standardized harness results. Zep has not been run on Synap's harness at all, so the table states that absence rather than borrowing a number from elsewhere.

Pick Mem0 for the largest community and simplest memory API. Pick Zep for a mature bitemporal knowledge graph with VPC deployment. Pick Letta for fully open-source self-hosting with white-box memory transparency. Pick Supermemory for SOC 2 / HIPAA compliance certifications today. Pick Cognee for graph-native retrieval with 14 traversal modes. Pick Evermind for self-evolving skills that learn standard operating procedures over time. Each has a real strength that matters for specific use cases.

Agentic context management is the system that captures, structures, compacts, and recalls context for AI agents across conversations and sessions. It goes beyond storing embeddings: it handles entity resolution, temporal awareness, contradiction detection, scope isolation, and per-agent pipeline customization. Synap is an active context management layer — the system manages context so the agent does not have to.

Yes. Synap's core SDK and the LongMemEval evaluation harness are open source. You can self-host the stack or use the managed platform at synap.maximem.ai with a free tier (no credit card).

On the same open-source LongMemEval harness, Mem0 scores 73.8% against Maximem Synap's 92% (and 93.2% on LoCoMo). Zep has not been run on that harness; its own paper reports 71.2%. If you are weighing Mem0 vs Zep, Synap is the strongest Mem0 alternative on accuracy, with an in-conversation P75 under 15 ms served from a pre-fetched in-process cache, Python and JavaScript SDKs, 23 framework integrations, and a nested scope chain. Free tier, no credit card.